Skip to main content
Logical Fallacies

Problems of Logic

A proof or argument can fail because it skips needed steps, makes an invalid inference, or substitutes confident assertion for justification. Checking what each conclusion follows from helps distinguish these problems.

THE IDEA

PROBLEMS OF LOGIC

Problems of logic in proofs include:

• Gaps in the logic: leaping from one statement to another without justifying it, or leaving out too many steps in between.

• Incorrect inferences: this is when a logical step is made that is actually incorrect, where you say something follows logically from something else, but it doesn’t.

• Handwaving: arriving at a conclusion without true use of logic, but by metaphorically waving your hands around enough that people think you are.

• Incorrect logic: subtle fallacies can make an unsupported argument appear valid.

Handwaving often occurs backed up by yelling and insults in arguments in normal life. A comment such as “Anyone with half a brain cell can see this!” may substitute an insult for the missing justification.

An example of an incorrect inference is the view that “scientists agree with each other, which shows there is a conspiracy”. The conclusion (there is a conspiracy) does not follow logically from the fact that people are agreeing with each other, since agreement could also arise from independently examining the same evidence.

An example of a gap in logic is when one person is blamed for something, and all the other factors are ignored. Consider a so-called “swatting” tragedy when a hoax call is made to the police who then storm an innocent person’s home and shoot them dead. If the police often place all the blame on the hoax caller they are leaving out the fact that they shot an innocent person dead with precious little evidence or reason.

An incorrect inference can be subtle. Ask which premises support the conclusion and whether an alternative explanation remains possible.

When to use it

  • Evaluating the validity of arguments in political debates or media commentary.

  • Analyzing legal reasoning to spot gaps or unsupported leaps in prosecution or defense claims.

  • Improving personal decision-making by checking for logical errors in one's own reasoning.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Incorrect Inference: Scientists Agreeing as Evidence of Conspiracy

The argument that 'scientists agree with each other, which shows there is a conspiracy' is an example of an incorrect inference. The conclusion (conspiracy) does not logically follow from the premise (agreement).

02

Gap in Logic: Blaming Only the Hoax Caller in a Swatting Tragedy

In a 'swatting' tragedy where a hoax call leads to police shooting an innocent person, placing all blame on the caller ignores the police's actions and judgment, creating a gap in logic.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. Can you identify a gap in logic in a recent argument you've encountered?

  2. Think of an example where someone used handwaving instead of sound reasoning. How could you challenge it?

  3. How might emotions influence the persistence of incorrect inferences in debates?

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • The Art of Logic How to Make Sense in a World that Doesn’t (Eugenia Cheng)
← More logical fallacies